PonderAtlas printable field sheet
Ethical dilemma case sheet
Move a group from reaction to reasoning: record a verdict, isolate the rule behind it, then test it against a modified case and a rival framework.
- Short route
- 20 minutes
- Deep route
- 50 minutes
- Revised
- 2026-07-25
20-minute route
- 2 min: Read the topic setup on the canonical guide.
- 3 min: Record an initial answer before discussion.
- 10 min: Compare two reasons and test one variation.
- 5 min: Write the strongest objection and a revised position.
50-minute extension
- 5 min: Silent reading and first position.
- 15 min: Small-group reason mapping.
- 15 min: Swap positions and defend the strongest rival.
- 10 min: Test a nearby case or changed context.
- 5 min: Final reflection and remaining uncertainty.
Prompt sequence
- 01
Name a case where the best overall outcome is one you would still refuse to bring about.
- 02
Which duty would you keep even knowing it made things worse—and why that one?
- 03
Describe a decision where the right act was obvious but doing it required a trait you lacked.
- 04
How much more do you owe someone close to you, and what justifies the difference?
- 05
What has to be true of an action before blame is fair rather than merely useful?
- 06
Does the existence of deep moral disagreement change what you think is true, or only how confident you are?
Position and process cues
- State the verdict first, in one sentence, before any justification.
- Name the rule or value that produced it—consequences, a duty, a virtue, or a relationship.
- Change one feature of the case until your verdict flips, and say which feature did the work.
- Write the strongest objection from a rival framework, then state your revised position and remaining uncertainty.