Offline-ready artifacts

Field sheets made to be used.

Every sheet works without an account, names its learning purpose and source page, and includes a short route plus an optional deeper extension.

The Ship of Theseus field sheet

Compare an initial intuition with competing accounts of identity, then record the strongest objection and a revised position.

Compare an initial intuition with competing accounts of knowledge, then record the strongest objection and a revised position.

Compare an initial intuition with competing accounts of ethics, then record the strongest objection and a revised position.

Compare an initial intuition with competing accounts of appearance and reality, then record the strongest objection and a revised position.

Compare an initial intuition with competing accounts of vagueness, then record the strongest objection and a revised position.

Compare an initial intuition with competing accounts of time and causation, then record the strongest objection and a revised position.

Compare an initial intuition with competing accounts of truth and language, then record the strongest objection and a revised position.

Hold a consent-led conversation about care, freedom, constancy and friendship without scoring the relationship.

Separate situation, constraint, freedom, responsibility and commitment without reducing existentialism to a slogan.

Keep meaning, wellbeing and what is worth wanting apart long enough to find out which question a disagreement is really about.

Distinguish functional explanation from experiential explanation, then test a position against a borderline case.

Move a group from reaction to reasoning: record a verdict, isolate the rule behind it, then test it against a modified case and a rival framework.

Reconstruct a sceptical argument as premises, locate the one you reject, and state the standard for knowledge that commits you to.

Separate how time is experienced from how time is, then apply one position to travel, memory and change and record what it costs.

Hold a careful, skippable conversation about deprivation, symmetry, duration and legacy, ending on a practical commitment rather than a verdict.